This recent New York Times’ article about proposed federal regulations for the Payday lending industry, Consumer Protection Agency Seeks Limits on Payday Lenders, highlights some of the behind-the-scenes battles in this sector. While the article describes some of the abusive practices and the threat that proposed regulations pose to those practices, it fails to describe any alternative lending practices that might replace the predatory ones. I’m thinking in particular of some of the micro-lending and micro-finance efforts that have been pioneered in India and elsewhere; also some of the local and “slow money” initiatives in the United States. Finally, I’d be curious to know whether adding requirements that Payday lenders include a significant percentage of their clientele in both management and ownership–like a cooperative–might be beneficial.
Interested in working with us to bring better discussions to your classroom, community or workplace?
Ignaz Semmelweis, a Hungarian physician, discovered the impact of germs on proper medical treatment and proposed that doctors scrub their hands before conducting any procedure. By implementing the then-innovative practice...
Harvesting what we already know about collaborative experiences and empowering groups to create collaborative guidelines Dear collaborative discussion friends, Welcome to the Collaborative Discussion Project Newsletter. In our first newsletter,...
Margot Stern was born in Chicago in 1941. She was five when her family moved to Memphis, and her experience growing up in a Jewish family in the Jim Crow...