This opinion piece, Scientific Pride and Prejudice, in the New York Times struck me as a worthy argument, but also an old and now largely obvious one. Who doesn’t know by now that science is an imperfect process, highly affected by scientists’ “prejudgments.” Duh. What’s still remarkable is that it also has a built-in and self-critical review process–albeit a slow and also imperfect process.
Interested in working with us to bring better discussions to your classroom, community or workplace?
What would it look like if democracy were to collapse here in the US? Imagine you find yourself transported to a future where democracy in America has ended. Picture what...
Who should be in the room? Dear collaborative discussion friends, This week we are highlighting Activity 5.2 Developing an Awareness of Stakeholders, designed to help participants think deeply and methodically...
Developing a Paradox Mindset Dear collaborative discussion friends, This week we are highlighting an activity that helps participants develop a “paradox mindset” by engaging with, rather than avoiding, the contradictions...